|
Ground decision?
|
|
07-24-2008, 11:49 PM
Post: #31
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Ground decision?
MC i cant understand if the liverpool labour party opposed it why wasnt be brought to task over it , he has gone not only against the lib dems but also his own party.
just didnt see the point or the timing of the letter. free season tickets come to mind SCOUSE BY BIRTH, ENGLISH BY LAW, EVERTONIAN BY THE GRACE OF GOD |
|||
|
07-25-2008, 12:53 AM
Post: #32
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Ground decision?
MichaelCorleone Wrote:Steve Blue Wrote:the kilfoyle letter ? ahh well only time will tell, but its the biggest decision ever in our history which ever way it goes. The letter smacked of a local Labour MP backing a potentially contentious Labour Govt decision - when it was aired last week. Bradley appeared to think that way & responded as such. Although things appeared to have maybe changed yet again since. IMO all of the politicians involved in this are self serving fools - Bradley & his mates talk in riddles - they've appeared to show interest & make the right noises, when in reality they've done F all since the KD scheme died. His recent suggestion of revisiting the shared stadium idea was as a prime example. His suggested "alternatives should the club find new investment", as he puts it, are total cobblers - it's like showing a bloke a new BMW when he's got barely enough money for a 2nd hand Skoda. Kilfoyle is no better & his jibes at LCC in that letter were unseemly. However I did agree with him correcting the totally false statements made by LCC regarding the economic impact on Walton of our potential move - he was quite right to say that the impact will be minimal - because it will. Very little of our £50M club turnover stays in L4 - the matchday benefits that local traders receive in additon to that turnover - is small beer when compared to a £400M development in a neighbouring borough - so the regional benefit far outweighs the local loss. The RS superdome & the development of associated food outlets etc that will come with it, will bring increased employment to the area anyway - as would a potential redevelopment of GP land - particularly if it incorporated a retail element. I wish they'd just get the decision out there now - it's become a farce. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|





